(no subject)
Apr. 13th, 2004 04:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We met the Sloane Kettering surgeon yesterday. Vastly more competant, reassuring, informative, kinder, more responsive, and generally Better. We shall be going there, no question.
Mom has a 15 percent chance of nodal involvement. Since the false negative rate of the sentinel node procedure is about 5%, and 5% of 15% is less than 1%, we're going with that. If the frozen second is positive, he'll go for axillary node and take 'em out. If it's not but the more detailed analysis is, they'll decide together whether to go back in.
Really hope there's no nodes. Even one takes the chances down from excellent to pretty good. Odds can be beaten, of course, and I know plenty of people who've done it, but it's not guaranteed.
He also said there's a possibility it is medullary. It has the signs of white blood cell activity and hormone negative. Medullary is good news, you have better odds. He didn't feel any nodes, which is also good news. He is having their people recheck the other breast just to be sure.
Team approach better too. Got in to see a plastic surgeon on the spot instead of getting a vague referral and two weeks to make it happen herself. I didn't like the plastic surgeon, who treated any question from me as an unwelcome interruption, as much as the regular surgeon, but mom seems to like him okay and so long as he's good, which he certainly seems to be, I don't care if I never want to have dinner with him.
She wanted the "trans flap" reconstruction, or more accurately the "free flap", which is the most natural looking but a much longer, harder operation and not indicated for smokers. (Mom's been smoking a long time.) Plus you can only do it once, so if she needs a second masectomy later she couldn't do it again.
Upshot is, she quits smoking now. Has a masectomy in two weeks with the pre-implant stretcher thingie which is simpler, saves the skin, and is better than nothing. In six weeks she'll get her genetic test back and know if she's going to have a prophelatic masectomy on the other side. (It's worth it if you have the gene, not if you don't. Odds go from something like 7 percent in 10 years, to 70.)
Then she'll be having chemo. She's right on the edge: over 1 cm. tumor gets it, under doesn't. She's right at 1 according to mammogram but even if it comes out under in actual surgery she's gonna go for the chemo -- be on the safe side especially since it's not hormone receptive so she can't take the estrogen blockers instead.
When chemo's over, either 4 or 9 months later depending on nodal involvement, she'll have the second operation if needed, and then have the transflap for one or both at once. Unless she changes her mind and just goes for the implant. The implant scar will make the transflap a little harder, but the plastic surgeon is confident he can do it and since the risk is only to poorer cosmetic result, not health, if mom is okay with it I am too.
We've been looking into Sloane's new "dose dense" chemo which seems to have better results and fewer sideeffects. Also the user of herceptin as an adjuvant treatment. That's still in clinical trials. Mom would qualify if she has more than 4 nodes. Sort of hope she doesn't.
We go in Monday for pre-surgical teaching, consent, and testing. Earliest surgery would be April 29. I have my weight in brochures to read and take notes on, which is all that's keeping me from chewing my metaphorical nails.
I wept all over mom last night, which I felt bad about (she shouldn't have to comfort me) but she didn't mind. Keep wanting to hang on to her so she can't go anywhere. Unconscious mind not the brightest, evidently.
Snapped at my therapist, too. She didn't want me go too far into fear for stuff that hasn't happened and may never. I want there to be one place where I can be afraid and not have to be strong, and cheerful, and brave. I want to deal with the reality of the risk and not end up, if the worst does happen, at a sheer drop off beyond which I've never let myself imagine. The thing about cliffs is that I tend to go over them.
She apologized. Damn straight.
Mer
Mom has a 15 percent chance of nodal involvement. Since the false negative rate of the sentinel node procedure is about 5%, and 5% of 15% is less than 1%, we're going with that. If the frozen second is positive, he'll go for axillary node and take 'em out. If it's not but the more detailed analysis is, they'll decide together whether to go back in.
Really hope there's no nodes. Even one takes the chances down from excellent to pretty good. Odds can be beaten, of course, and I know plenty of people who've done it, but it's not guaranteed.
He also said there's a possibility it is medullary. It has the signs of white blood cell activity and hormone negative. Medullary is good news, you have better odds. He didn't feel any nodes, which is also good news. He is having their people recheck the other breast just to be sure.
Team approach better too. Got in to see a plastic surgeon on the spot instead of getting a vague referral and two weeks to make it happen herself. I didn't like the plastic surgeon, who treated any question from me as an unwelcome interruption, as much as the regular surgeon, but mom seems to like him okay and so long as he's good, which he certainly seems to be, I don't care if I never want to have dinner with him.
She wanted the "trans flap" reconstruction, or more accurately the "free flap", which is the most natural looking but a much longer, harder operation and not indicated for smokers. (Mom's been smoking a long time.) Plus you can only do it once, so if she needs a second masectomy later she couldn't do it again.
Upshot is, she quits smoking now. Has a masectomy in two weeks with the pre-implant stretcher thingie which is simpler, saves the skin, and is better than nothing. In six weeks she'll get her genetic test back and know if she's going to have a prophelatic masectomy on the other side. (It's worth it if you have the gene, not if you don't. Odds go from something like 7 percent in 10 years, to 70.)
Then she'll be having chemo. She's right on the edge: over 1 cm. tumor gets it, under doesn't. She's right at 1 according to mammogram but even if it comes out under in actual surgery she's gonna go for the chemo -- be on the safe side especially since it's not hormone receptive so she can't take the estrogen blockers instead.
When chemo's over, either 4 or 9 months later depending on nodal involvement, she'll have the second operation if needed, and then have the transflap for one or both at once. Unless she changes her mind and just goes for the implant. The implant scar will make the transflap a little harder, but the plastic surgeon is confident he can do it and since the risk is only to poorer cosmetic result, not health, if mom is okay with it I am too.
We've been looking into Sloane's new "dose dense" chemo which seems to have better results and fewer sideeffects. Also the user of herceptin as an adjuvant treatment. That's still in clinical trials. Mom would qualify if she has more than 4 nodes. Sort of hope she doesn't.
We go in Monday for pre-surgical teaching, consent, and testing. Earliest surgery would be April 29. I have my weight in brochures to read and take notes on, which is all that's keeping me from chewing my metaphorical nails.
I wept all over mom last night, which I felt bad about (she shouldn't have to comfort me) but she didn't mind. Keep wanting to hang on to her so she can't go anywhere. Unconscious mind not the brightest, evidently.
Snapped at my therapist, too. She didn't want me go too far into fear for stuff that hasn't happened and may never. I want there to be one place where I can be afraid and not have to be strong, and cheerful, and brave. I want to deal with the reality of the risk and not end up, if the worst does happen, at a sheer drop off beyond which I've never let myself imagine. The thing about cliffs is that I tend to go over them.
She apologized. Damn straight.
Mer
Sloan Kettering
Date: 2004-04-13 02:13 pm (UTC)Your mom couldn't get much better care than at Sloan-Kettering.
She'll be in good hands.
Again, I wish for both of you what will do you the most good. :>
Re: Sloan Kettering
Date: 2004-04-13 05:55 pm (UTC)Parking's a bitch, though, LOL.
Re: Sloan Kettering
From:Re: Sloan Kettering
Date: 2004-04-14 06:51 am (UTC)That's what we figured. It's a potentially life-threatening illness, go with the best. And luckily it's in her insurance network!
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 06:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 02:31 pm (UTC)Let me know if there's anything that I can do? Your involvement in this has been amazing; your mother is lucky that she has you. I know a lot of women whose daughters haven't been willing to be this involved (my own mother included).
Love you.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 06:56 am (UTC)Love you.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 02:40 pm (UTC)But to the extent that she can, it may well help comfort her.
*hugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:01 am (UTC)The tiny baby in your icon is adorable!
Mer
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:57 am (UTC)It's vaguely possible that she won't need chemo. Maybe the tumor will be so much smaller than it looked that the doctors will say pshaw, no need. But it's not the way to bet.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:59 am (UTC)We'll see after the surgery. If there are no nodes and it's medullary, I will be *extremely* optimistic. If there's lots and it's in the chest wall, maybe not so much.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 04:55 pm (UTC)Totally makes sense that you need a place where you don't have to be brave and cheerful. Being brave and cheerful in situations like that can really exhaust your soul.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 08:00 am (UTC)I don't imagine I will do it to her too often. But since she didn't mind, once was kinda nice. No secrets, you know?
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 05:06 pm (UTC)((hugs))
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 08:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 05:43 pm (UTC)Thats not fair of your therapist to say that! Things like this are major and scary and you have every right to worry about them! I would be worried if you did just shrug it off like no big deal.
::snuggles up to you and gives you some tissues::
And I'm sure your mom understands and it probably makes her feel better that she can still take care of you.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:31 am (UTC)It's not that my shrink didn't want me to worry. She just didn't want me to go past worry to feeling sadness, or something. Still annoying, though, but I don't think she'll do it again. In general I'm not a big fan of being told I should stop what I'm feeling and feel something else.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 06:07 pm (UTC)I did that. I bought all the books and did all the research and found support groups for Mom. Then one day she showed me a chapter in some book about adult children acting like the parent when their mothers have breast cancer. Then we laughed and released a whole bunch of tension.
(I felt sort of uncomfortable tellng you this, because I don't want to make this about me when it's about you and your mom. I decided to tell you, though, because I wanted you to know you're not alone. It helped me to find that out when we were going through it, so I hope it helps you.)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:27 am (UTC)Mer
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 07:54 pm (UTC)Don't feel bad about crying on your mom. Honestly, I think both you *and* your mom will be better off if you don't feel like you have to be strong *all* the time. It's good to show a little vulnerability sometimes in these situations. On the one hand, it may be hard for her. On the other hand, it'll probably help her to be more at ease with her own feelings, and with you. This is hard stuff. You're both human...and the facade of invincibility only goes so far. *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:19 am (UTC)And I guess she has seen people do too much pre-grieving. But I would have thought she'd know me better by now. It's not easy for me to slip into my fears, it's hard for me to let myself get there. And when I do, the last thing I need is to be shut down.
Plus, frankly, a certain amount of pre-grieving is my style. I tend to mourn things (high school graduation, ending relationships) before they happen, so that by the time the end actually comes it's not unthinkable any more. I'm not happy, but I'm at least braced. Possibly that in itself is something to address in therapy, though I'm not convinced it's a problem, but either way, not right now.
And I think you're right. It's reminding me of Buffy -- as everything does. Did you watch that show? There's an episode after her mom dies when she's being all practical girl and it's not till she lets herself cry with her sister that the healing really starts. Not that my mom is dying, but you know what I mean.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 08:52 pm (UTC)I wish you and your mum the very best.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-13 09:23 pm (UTC)Yeah.
It's tough for some people to deal with other people's negative emotion without trying to Fix It or otherwise make it go away. A therapist, however, ought to know better than to go for the quick Fix It approach.
Good thing she apologized.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:24 am (UTC)Unless, of course, she was going for giving me a legitimate target for my anger. She doesn't usually manipulate me that way, but under the circumstances she might have felt it warranted, and if that's the case I'm not sure she was wrong.
Mer
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:07 am (UTC)*BIG BIG HUGS*
Courage to you both.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-14 07:22 am (UTC)Thank you.
Slogans that are actually true
Date: 2004-04-14 09:44 am (UTC)Lots of good thoughts and wishes to you and your mom.
Re: Slogans that are actually true
Date: 2004-04-14 10:29 am (UTC)