![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Thank you, whoever nominated my story Charades for the Angel Without Wings awards!
You know what the problem with “sucky first drafts” is? Second drafts. I recently read![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
truepenny on habits of thought that no longer work, and am now wondering if the issue I had with writing workshops was a bit beside the point. They seemed to think every story can be fixed and every story needs fixing, whereas I wanted to leave well alone with the best and scrap the worst and start over. But while I still think they fell down on teaching when to revise, they do teach how to revise. If I’d just gone into it for what I wanted out of it and ignored the rest, I might be better at this now. I’m okay at tidying up the mechanics, but the Big Rethink that might save a fair but flawed? Not so much.
Its fine enough to just toss a short story that’s not working and try another one, but it’d be maddening to do over and over with novels after a hundred pages or so. And since part of the reason I’ve been trying short stories is to practice for novels, I really should try to adopt a plan that will scale up.
Which means I’ve also got to break myself of the habit of editing a story through from the beginning to wherever I left off each time before I add anything new. This takes long enough with the last few scenes of a 10,000 word story – at 100,000 it’ll be completely unworkable. And it also means that the beginning of any story of mine is edited many times more than the end. OTOH, I am superstitiously reluctant to mess with anything that's working at all.
You know what the problem with “sucky first drafts” is? Second drafts. I recently read
truepenny on habits of thought that no longer work, and am now wondering if the issue I had with writing workshops was a bit beside the point. They seemed to think every story can be fixed and every story needs fixing, whereas I wanted to leave well alone with the best and scrap the worst and start over. But while I still think they fell down on teaching when to revise, they do teach how to revise. If I’d just gone into it for what I wanted out of it and ignored the rest, I might be better at this now. I’m okay at tidying up the mechanics, but the Big Rethink that might save a fair but flawed? Not so much. Its fine enough to just toss a short story that’s not working and try another one, but it’d be maddening to do over and over with novels after a hundred pages or so. And since part of the reason I’ve been trying short stories is to practice for novels, I really should try to adopt a plan that will scale up.
Which means I’ve also got to break myself of the habit of editing a story through from the beginning to wherever I left off each time before I add anything new. This takes long enough with the last few scenes of a 10,000 word story – at 100,000 it’ll be completely unworkable. And it also means that the beginning of any story of mine is edited many times more than the end. OTOH, I am superstitiously reluctant to mess with anything that's working at all.
no subject
Hmmmm. If there were enough of us interested, I wonder if we could get a group together to do it online, and then go hunting for a teacher -- an editor might be as good or better than a more experienced writer for that kind of thing.